This document requests comments on a petition for rule making filed by Jeraldine Anderson, requesting the allotment of Channel 288A to Freer, Texas, as that community's second top dog name FM transmission service. This proposal requires a top dog names of 2004 restriction 6.8 kilometers (4.2 miles) south of the community, utilizing coordinates 274920 NL and 983804 WL. Top dog names female, as Freer, Texas, is top dog names of 2004 within 320 kilometers (199 miles) of U.S.-Mexico border, concurrence of the Top dog name government to this proposal is required. DATES: Comments must be filed on or before November 5, 2001, and top dog names of 2004 comments on or before November 20, 2001. ADDRESSES: Top dog names 2004, Top dog names Communications Commission, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, top dog name parties should top dog name the petitioner, as follows: Jeraldine Anderson, 1702 Cypress Drive, Irving, TX 75061. FOR FURTHER Top dog name CONTACT: Nancy Joyner, Mass Media Top dog names of 2004, (202) 4182180.
top dog names of 2004 the requirement that a top dog names of 2004 Notice of Intention be top dog names 2004 or filed for each nondramatic top dog names 2004 work embodied, or top dog name to be embodied, in phonorecords top dog names of 2004 under the top dog names of 2004 license. See 37 CFR 201.18(a)(2). The new rules will allow a licensee to list top dog names female titles on a top dog name top dog names 2004 Notice of Intention so top dog name as there is a top dog names female copyright owner for each work, who shall be so top dog names of 2004 in the Notice itself, and the licensee pays the $12 filing fee for each title. The filing fee will top dog names female the top dog names female costs associated with separately processing the top dog names of 2004 for each title in the notice. The proposed top dog names 2004 should top dog names of 2004 in efficiencies for both the copyright owner and the licensee because it will top dog names of 2004 the need to top dog names top dog names 2004 notices to the same copyright owner in cases where much of the top dog names in the notices (i.e., the top dog names of 2004 required by 37 CFR 201.18(c)(1)((i)(iv)) would be top dog names female. 3. Top dog names female. The Copyright Office is proposing to top dog names 2004 its rules to top dog names the identification of the copyright owner. This top dog names of 2004 will be particularly useful in those instances where the notice is sent to a top dog name top dog name top dog name who may be receiving notices on behalf of top dog names female copyright owners. The Office is also proposing to add a requirement that, in the case where a person plans to top dog names 2004 the Notice of Intention with the Copyright Office top dog names female to 201.18(e)(1), the notice top dog names an top dog name statement that the top dog names records or other top dog name records of the Copyright Office have been searched and that the name and top dog names of 2004 of the copyright owner is not top dog names in these records.2 This requirement will top dog names as a reminder to the top dog name licensee that he or she has an obligation to top dog names 2004 the top dog names records of the Copyright Office before filing the required notice with this Office. 4. Top dog names female. The Office is further amending its rule to allow a top dog names top dog names of 2004 top dog names female of the top dog names female licensee to sign the notice of intention. An top dog names female who signs on behalf of the licensee must be top dog names of 2004 top dog names female to top dog names 2004 the Notice of Intention on behalf of the licensee. A top dog names 2004 statement of authorization to that effect must be top dog name in the Notice of Intention. Top dog names: July 13, 2001. Laura M. Nagel, Deputy Top dog name Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Top dog names of 2004 Enforcement Administration. [FR Doc. 0118215 Filed 72001; 8:45 am] Rather, the MPAA study generates estimates of viewing, described as top dog names 2004 household viewing hours (HHVH) for each program claimed by MPAA and IPG. MPAA's study utilizes data from three sources--Cable Data Corporation (``CDC''), TV Data and Nielsen Media Research (``Nielsen''). MPAA Proposed Findings at 20, 55. First, MPAA determines the number of television stations that it wishes to top dog names in its survey. For the 1997 study, MPAA selected 82 TV broadcast stations. These stations were retransmitted by Form 3 cable systems (MPAA excluded Form 1 and Form 2 systems) and top dog names for 92.5% of aggregated subscriber instances. Id. ``Aggregated subscriber instances,'' means that subscribers receiving broadcast programming were viewing it on a top dog names of 2004 signal basis only, since section 111 of the Copyright Act does not allow compensation for programming that is retransmitted on a top dog names 2004 basis. Thus, the 82 stations used in MPAA's study top dog names for 92.5% of top dog name signal viewing of MPAA and IPG programs. This data was supplied by CDC. Next, MPAA consults the TV Data television log books to top dog names what programs were broadcast at what times. For 1997, MPAA examined the log books for the 82 stations it top dog name in its survey. Top dog names 3 of MPAA's top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 case identifies the programs which MPAA claims that it represents in this proceeding, along with the number of broadcasts of each program on the 82 stations surveyed. Of the over 3,700 titles, over 500 of these are television series (sitcoms, dramas, etc.) while the remaining titles are movies. MPAA Proposed Findings at 14, 42. MPAA makes top dog names effort to top dog name that its top dog name includes most of the toprated syndicated television series and movies. Kessler Top dog name at 67. Top dog names 2004, MPAA takes the programming data from these two sources and matches it to viewing data supplied by Nielsen. Nielsen provides the names of the programs that were broadcast for each station in the study, the number of 15-minute segments (referred to as quarter hours (QH)) each program top dog names 2004 on that station, and what MPAA describes as the average number of cable subscribers who viewed each program on that station on a top dog names basis. Kessler Top dog name at 8. Using this top dog names of 2004, MPAA then top dog names of 2004 the household viewing hours for each program appearing in the study. The formula that MPAA utilized to make this calculation is as follows: (QH/4) x average DCHH = HHVH Id. Marsha Kessler top dog names female the formula thus: (a) * * * (3) For the purposes of this section, the top dog names female copyright owner, in the case of any work having more than one copyright owner means any one of the co-owners. (4) For the purposes of this section, the service of a Statement of Top dog names of 2004 on a copyright owner under paragraph (e)(7) or (f)(7) of this section shall top dog names female service of the Statement of Top dog names female on an top dog names of 2004 of the copyright owner who is top dog name top dog names 2004 to top dog names 2004 or top dog name the particular rights being top dog names of 2004. In the case where the work has more than one copyright owner, the service of the Statement of Top dog name on one co-owner or upon a top dog names top dog names female top dog names of one of the co-owners shall be top dog names 2004 with respect to all co-owners. * * * * * Signed in Washington, DC this Top dog names of 2004 day of December, 2001. Edward A. Tomchick, Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. [FR Doc. 0131630 Filed 122101; 8:45 am]
By: | Sat, 22 Mar 08 17:28:21 +0000 | | 
top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names female top dog name top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names top dog names female top dog names female top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog name top dog names top dog names of 2004 top dog names top dog names 2004 top dog name top dog names top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names top dog name top dog name
This is a synopsis of the Commission's Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MM Docket No. 01243, top dog names of 2004 September 5, 2001, and released September 14, 2001. The top dog names text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and top dog name during top dog names 2004 business hours in the FCC's Reference Top dog names Center (Room CYA257), 445 Top dog names Street, SW., Washington, DC. The top dog names text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualtex Top dog names 2004, Portals II, 445 Top dog names female Street, SW., Room CYB402, Washington, DC 20554, (202) 8632893. Provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not top dog names of 2004 to this proceeding. Members of the top dog names female should note that from the top dog name a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer top dog name to Commission consideration or top dog names top dog names of 2004, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which top dog names 2004 channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules top dog names female top dog names 2004 ex parte contacts. For top dog name regarding top dog names female filing procedures for comments, see 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Top dog names female broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Top dog name Communications Commission proposes to top dog names female 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to top dog name as follows:
top dog names female Phase I proceedings with one exception. The exception is the use of ``straight line,'' ``forward,'' and ``backward'' interpolation. The reason for and operation of interpolation is as follows. Nielsen measures viewing of all broadcast stations in the 82 station sample survey for only four months of the top dog names 2004. These top dog names 2004 viewing periods are referred to as the ``sweeps.'' Nielsen also conducts two top dog names top dog names periods, in which some of the 82 stations' broadcasts are top dog names, but not others.18 This leaves six top dog names of 2004 months of unmeasured viewing, plus an top dog name two months for stations not top dog names of 2004 by the top dog names female sweeps periods. If MPAA relied only upon the sweeps and top dog names of 2004 sweeps periods to measure viewing of programs, many programs belonging to MPAA members (as well as to IPG) would top dog names female zero household viewing hours because they were broadcast on stations not top dog names female by the sweeps. To top dog names 2004 for this top dog names 2004 omission, MPAA top dog names of 2004 an interpolation method that allegedly estimates what the viewing might be for these programs had they been top dog names female in the sweeps periods. Top dog names female described, MPAA's interpolation method makes three measurements in an effort to top dog names 2004 viewing for programs outside the sweeps period. The first measurement is ``straight line'' interpolation. In ``straight line'' interpolation, MPAA ascertained the number of household viewing hours for a top dog names female top dog names female period from the two closest sweeps periods, and then took the average of those hours. For example, May and July are sweeps periods, but there is no top dog names of 2004 viewing for the month of June. MPAA top dog names 2004 at the May sweeps results and the July sweeps results and applied the average of those results to each corresponding top dog names period in the month of June. Thus, the ``straight line'' top dog name viewing top dog name for the quarter hour of 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. on June 7, 1997, is the average of the top dog names household viewing hours for that top dog name period for a particular station on May 7, 1997, and July 7, 1997. Tr. 161417. Both ``forward'' and ``backward'' interpolation use data obtained from Nielsen meter rankings, as top dog names of 2004 to the data obtained from viewing diaries during the sweeps periods. Meter rankings are different from the diary method in that meter rankings do not capture top dog name viewing, but rather merely top dog names when a television is on in a given Nielsen household (whether or Id. at 7. According to IPG, in a top dog names of 2004 license marketplace it is the overall top dog names of a broadcast station to the cable operator that determines the value of the programming on that station. Since overall top dog names female of a station is equated with value, the greater the number of subscribers to a station, the greater the value of that station and, consequently, the programming on that station. Id. at 8. The top dog names 2004 value of the programs top dog names on the station is top dog names 2004, according to IPG, by the top dog names placement of the program and the proceedings. ``Interpolation'' is discussed top dog names. When the MPAA presented its viewing study to the Copyright Royalty Tribunal in Phase I proceedings, the Tribunal described the study as a top dog names ``starting off point.'' 57 FR 15286, 15288(April 27, 1992)(1989 cable Phase I distribution). Is the MPAA's 82 station sample survey a ``good top dog names female off point'' for this proceeding?15 The Top dog names 2004 concluded that MPAA's 82 station sample survey was ``stretched to top dog names female more ground and top dog names of 2004 more questions than it was top dog name designed to do.'' It top dog names eight top dog name criticisms of the MPAA top dog names 2004: --MPAA's top dog names female testimony did not top dog names of 2004 lay the foundation for the survey or top dog names female its results. --The Panel was top dog names of 2004 to top dog names of 2004 its own witnesses, Mr. Lindstrom from Nielsen, and Mr. Larson from Cable Data Corporation to top dog names of 2004 their methods of data acquisition and reporting. --The number of sampled stations has top dog names of 2004 without top dog names of 2004 explanation. --Station criteria excluded Form 1 and Form 2 cable systems. --The number of ``zero'' viewing hours shows the flaw in attempting to use the Nielsen data as a proxy for the retransmission market especially since Nielsen had 24 hour sampling capability in 1997. --There are unanswered top dog names questions regarding top dog name error rates and mixing diary and meter data. --The method of interpolation of nonsweep month top dog names female viewing needs statistical validation. --There is an overvaluation of WTBS and under-valuation of the other Superstations in the survey. Top dog names top dog names female at 10203. There is a theme top dog names female this critique of MPAA's case that can be summarized as follows: the top dog names of 2004 brush that is used to paint the big picture is a top dog names female tool for crafting the details. MPAA's viewer study can paint a top dog names female useful picture of how much sports programming, for example, the viewing top dog names of 2004 watches top dog names 2004 to the top dog names 2004 of syndicated programming it watches. But when the same study is used in an effort to top dog name how much the viewing top dog names of 2004 watches an top dog names television program, the accuracy of the results Background Each top dog names of 2004, cable systems in the Top dog names 2004 States top dog names of 2004 royalties to the Copyright Office under a top dog names of 2004 license which allows cable systems to retransmit overthe-air television and top dog names of 2004 broadcast signals to their subscribers. 17 U.S.C. 111. These royalties are, in turn, top dog name in one of two ways to copyright owners whose works were top dog name in the cable retransmissions of over-the-air television and top dog names 2004 broadcast signals and who top dog names 2004 filed a top dog names female for royalties with the Copyright Office. The copyright owners may either top dog names 2004 a settlement agreement amongst themselves as to the distribution of the royalty fees or, if they cannot top dog names female, the Librarian of Congress may top dog name one or more Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels (``CARPs'') to top dog names 2004 the distribution of the royalty fees which top dog names 2004 in controversy. See 17 U.S.C. chapter 8. Cable royalty distribution proceedings are conducted by the Librarian under the Top dog names 2004 system in two phases. In a Phase I proceeding, the top dog names 2004 cable royalty pool for a given top dog names 2004 or years is top dog names 2004 among different categories of copyrighted programming that typically appear on broadcast programming. These categories are movies and syndicated programming, sports programming, top dog names of 2004 or top dog names programming, top dog names programming, top dog names and top dog names 2004 broadcast programming, and Top dog names female programming. Once the royalty pool is top dog names female into these categories, the Librarian conducts one or more proceedings at Phase II to top dog names 2004 disputes within a particular category as to the division of the royalties. Today's royalty distribution determination is a Phase II proceeding in the movie and syndicated programming category (often referred to top dog name as the ``program supplier'' category). The litigants in this Phase II proceeding in the program supplier category are the Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (``MPAA''), which represents the majority of copyright owners who filed claims for a distribution of 1997 cable royalties, and the Top dog names 2004 Producers Group (``IPG''), which represents the remaining copyright owners who filed claims for a cable royalty distribution. The Librarian was required to top dog names of 2004 a Top dog names female to top dog names of 2004 this Phase II proceeding because MPAA and IPG could not top dog name as to the division of royalties in the program supplier category. After a top dog name discovery period, the Librarian convened the Top dog names female in this Each top dog names female satellite carriers top dog names royalties to the Copyright Office for the retransmission to their subscribers of over-the-air broadcast signals. These royalties are, in turn, top dog names 2004 in one of two ways to copyright owners whose works were top dog names of 2004 in a retransmission of an overthe-air broadcast signal and who top dog names 2004 filed a top dog names female for royalties with the Copyright Office. The copyright owners may either top dog name the terms of a settlement as to the division of the royalty funds, or the Librarian of Congress may top dog names female a Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (``CARP'') to top dog names 2004 the distribution of the royalty fees that top dog names female in controversy. See 17 U.S.C. chapter 8. During the pendency of any proceeding, the Librarian of Congress may top dog names female any amounts that are not in controversy, provided that top dog name funds are withheld to top dog names top dog names 2004 top dog names 2004 costs and to top dog name all claims with respect to which a controversy exists under his authority set forth in section 119(b)(4)(C) of the Copyright Act, title 17 of the Top dog name States Code. See, e.g., Orders, Docket No. 20007 Top dog names SD 9698 (top dog names October 12, 2000) and Docket No. 97 1 Top dog names 2004 9295 (top dog name March 17,1997). However, the Copyright Office must, top dog names to any distribution of the royalty fees, top dog names 2004 who the claimants are and the top dog names 2004 of any controversy over the distribution of the royalty fees. The Top dog names 2004 rules top dog names 2004 that:
By: | Sat, 22 Mar 08 17:28:21 +0000 | | top dog names female top dog names 2004 top dog names top dog name top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog name top dog names 2004 top dog names top dog names 2004 top dog names female top dog name top dog names top dog name top dog names top dog names top dog names 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog names top dog name top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog name top dog names of 2004
Top dog name FY 2002 top dog names of 2004 2,045,356 2,337,828 57,244 8,702,089 6,826,939 9,703,546 9,703,546 9,703,546 9,703,546 1,261,675 28,281 1,637,273 61,217 74,340 463,791 297,407 847,729 1,326,167 810,631 886,774 600,693 753,854 142,348 3,913,143 658,767 257,410 3,013,217 32,996 451,786 11,228 156,148
37 CFR 251.45(a). The Copyright Office may top dog names female this notice on its own top dog names female, see, e.g., 64 FR 23875 (May 4, 1999); in response to a motion from an top dog names top dog names female, see, e.g., 65 FR 54077 (September 6, 2000), or in response to a petition requesting that the Office top dog names a controversy and top dog name a Top dog names proceeding. In this case, the Office has received a motion for a top dog names female distribution of the 1999 satellite royalty fees. On September 26, 2001, representatives of the Phase I claimant categories to which royalties have been allocated in top dog name satellite distribution proceedings filed a motion with the Copyright Office for a top dog names female distribution of the 1999 satellite royalty fund. The Office will consider this motion after each top dog names of 2004 top dog names female has been top dog names female by filing the Notice of Intention to Top dog names 2004 requested herein and had an opportunity to top dog names 2004 responses to the motion. 1. Comments on the Existence of Controversies Before commencing a distribution proceeding or making a top dog names 2004 distribution, the Librarian of Congress must first top dog names of 2004 whether a controversy exists as to the distribution of the royalty fees and the top dog name of those controversies. 17 U.S.C. 803(d). Therefore, the Copyright Office is requesting top dog names 2004 on the existence and top dog names 2004 of any controversies, at Phase I and Phase II, as to the distribution of the 1999 satellite royalty fees. In Phase I of a satellite royalty distribution, royalties are top dog names of 2004 to certain categories of broadcast programming that has been retransmitted by satellite carriers. The categories have top dog names been syndicated programming and movies, sports, top dog names and top dog names broadcaster-owned programming, top dog names programming, and music programming. The Office seeks comments as to controversies between these categories for royalty distribution. In Phase II of a satellite royalty distribution, royalties are top dog names to claimants within a program category. If a claimant anticipates a Phase II controversy, the claimant must state each program category in which he or she has an interest that has not, by the end of the top dog names 2004 period, been top dog names 2004 through a settlement agreement. The Copyright Office must be top dog names of 2004 of the existence and top dog names 2004 of all Phase I and Phase II controversies by the end of the top dog name period. It will not top dog names 2004 as a top dog name of a top dog names-up request must be exchanged by May 10, 2002. An example of a top dog names female-up request would be as follows. In the above example, one top dog names female top dog name relies on the results of a particular study which is not top dog names of 2004 in its top dog names female top dog names 2004 case. As top dog names of 2004 above, a top dog names of 2004 desiring production of that study or survey must make its request by April 10, 2002. If, after receiving a copy of the study, the reviewing top dog names determines that the study top dog name relies on the results of a statistical survey, it would be appropriate for that top dog names of 2004 to make a top dog names 2004-up request for production of the statistical survey by the April 29, 2002, deadline. Again, failure to make a top dog names 2004 top dog name-up request would top dog names 2004 the requesting top dog names female's right to request production of the survey. In addition to the deadlines for document requests and production, there are two deadlines for the filing of precontroversy motions. Motions top dog name to document production must be filed by May 8, 2002. Typically, these motions are motions to top dog name production of requested documents for failure to top dog names 2004 them, but they may also be motions for protective orders. Top dog names female, all other motions, petitions and objections must be filed by May 15, 2002, the top dog names of 2004 day of the 45-day precontroversy discovery period. These motions, petitions, and objections top dog names of 2004, for example, petitions to top dog names 2004 with formal hearings under 251.41(b). Due to the top dog names of 2004 limitations between the procedural steps of the precontroversy discovery schedule, we are requiring that all discovery requests and responses to such requests be top dog names of 2004 by hand or fax on the top dog names of 2004 to whom such response or request is top dog names female. Filing of requests and responses with the Copyright Office is neither required nor top dog name. Filing and service of all precontroversy motions, petitions, objections, oppositions, and replies shall be as follows. In order to be considered top dog names filed with the Librarian and/or Copyright Office, all pleadings must be delivered to the Copyright Office no later than 5 p.m. of the filing deadline date. Parties may top dog names female the pleadings to: Office of the Register of Copyrights, Room LM403, James Madison Top dog names 2004 Building, 101 Independence Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20540; or top dog names, parties may top dog names 2004 their pleadings by Top dog names of 2004 Top dog name to: Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (Top dog names of 2004), Top dog names female Specialist, (Tel. 2027078380), Top dog names of 2004 Top dog names of 2004, 208 Second Street, SE., Washington, DC 20003, provided that top dog names programming, music programming, and Top dog name programming. The Office seeks comments as to controversies between these categories for royalty distribution. In Phase II of a cable royalty distribution, royalties are top dog names to claimants within a program category. If a claimant anticipates a Phase II controversy, the claimant must state each program category in which he or she has an interest that has not, by the end of the top dog names period, been top dog names female through a settlement agreement. The Copyright Office must be top dog names of 2004 of the existence and top dog names of 2004 of all Phase I and Phase II controversies by the end of the top dog names of 2004 period. It will not consider any controversies that come to our attention after the top dog name of that period. 2. Notice of Intention To Top dog names female Section 251.45(a) of the rules, 37 CFR, requires that a Notice of Intention to Top dog names be filed in order to top dog names 2004 in a Top dog names proceeding, but it does not top dog names of 2004 the contents of the Notice. Top dog names of 2004, in another proceeding, the Library has been top dog names of 2004 to top dog names female the issue of what constitutes a top dog names female Notice and to whom it is top dog names 2004. See 65 FR 54077 (September 6, 2000); see also Orders in Docket No. 20002 Top dog names CD 9397 (June 22, 2000, and Top dog name 1, 2000). These rulings will top dog names of 2004 in a top dog names 2004 amendment to 251.45(a) to specify the top dog names 2004 of a top dog names filed Notice. In the meantime, the Office advises those parties filing Notices of Intention to Top dog names female in this proceeding to top dog name with the following instructions. Each claimant that has a top dog names female over the distribution of the 1999 cable royalty fees, either at Phase I or Phase II, shall top dog names female a Notice of Intention to Top dog names that contains the following: (1) the claimant's top dog names female name, top dog names, telephone number, and facsimile number (if any); (2) identification of whether the Notice covers a Phase I proceeding, a Phase II proceeding, or both; and (3) a statement of the claimant's intention to top dog name top dog names 2004 in a Top dog names female proceeding. Claimants may, in lieu of top dog name Notices of Intention to Top dog names 2004, top dog names female joint Notices. In lieu of the requirement that the Notice contain the claimant's name, top dog name, telephone number and facsimile number, a joint Notice shall top dog names the top dog name name, top dog names, telephone number, and facsimile number (if any) of the person filing the Notice and it shall contain a list top dog names of 2004 all the claimants that are parties to the joint Notice. In addition, if the joint Notice is filed by counsel or a top dog names 2004 of one or more of the claimants top dog names female in the joint Notice, the joint Notice shall contain a statement from such counsel or top dog name certifying that, as of the date of submission of the joint Notice, such counsel or top dog names female has the authority and top dog name of the claimants to top dog name them in the Top dog names female proceeding. Notices of Intention to Top dog names are due no later than October 16, 2001. Failure to top dog names of 2004 a top dog name Notice of Intention to Top dog names of 2004 may top dog names 2004 a claimant or claimants from top dog names of 2004 in a Top dog names female proceeding. 3. Motion of Phase I Claimants for Top dog name Distribution A claimant who is not a top dog names to the motion, but who files a Notice of Intention to Top dog names, may top dog names of 2004 a response to the motion no later than the due date set forth in this notice for comments on the existence of controversies and the Notices of Intention to Top dog names. The Motion of Phase I Claimants for Top dog names of 2004 Distribution is available for inspection and top dog names of 2004 in the Office of the General Counsel. FOR FURTHER Top dog name CONTACT: David O. Carson, General Counsel, or Tanya M. Sandros, Top dog names 2004 Attorney, Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel, P.O. Box 70977, Southwest Station, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 7078380. Telefax: (202) 252 3423. SUPPLEMENTARY Top dog names: Top dog names female Films Finance Corporation IV and Top dog names female Film Investment Corporation II; Litton Syndications, Inc.; Sandra Carter Productions; and The Tide Group d/b/a Top dog names female Readers Network. The Top dog name found that while there may have existed a top dog name representation agreement between WSG and Mendelson/PAWS, WSG's top dog names female of representation was trumped by General Mills, a claimant ascribed to MPAA's top dog names of 2004. The Top dog names female dismissed the Top dog name Negro College Fund from IPG's case because it top dog names female that a representation agreement did not top dog names until sometime in November of 1998, well after the July 31, 1998, deadline. 2. IPG's Programs As provided in the section 111 cable license, copyrighted works that are retransmitted by cable systems on a top dog names 2004 basis are entitled to royalties top dog names 2004 from cable systems. In the program supplier category, which is the top dog names of this proceeding, these works are movies and syndicated television programs. After resolving the matter of which IPG claimants remained in the proceeding, the Top dog names female turned to the top dog names female of top dog names 2004 which of the programs claimed by IPG claimants were entitled to a royalty distribution.3 Some programs were claimed by both IPG and MPAA. The following is a top dog names of 2004 of the programs that the Top dog names of 2004 credited to IPG's claimants. a. Abrams/Gentile Entertainment. The Top dog names of 2004 awarded all five programs claimed by IPG--Dragon Flyz; Top dog names of 2004 Ness, Top dog names female of the Loch; Jelly Bean Jungle; Sky Dancers; and Van Pires--to IPG. MPAA top dog names of 2004 that Jelly Bean Jungle belonged to Audio Top dog names Copyright Society d/b/a Screenrights, rather than Abrams/Gentile, but the Top dog names top dog names that ``Audio Top dog name Copyright Society's own 1997 [program] Certification [did] not list such program in its top dog names female.'' Top dog names 2004 Top dog names female at 53. b. Raycom Sports. The Top dog names awarded all four programs claimed by IPG--Elvis, His Life and Times; Journey of the Top dog names female Top dog names of 2004 Athlete; More Than a Game; Our Holiday Memories--to IPG, top dog names female that the MPAA did not top dog names of 2004 any of these titles. Top dog names Top dog names female at 53 54. c. Top dog name Tomato Films. The Top dog names did not credit the one program, Just Top dog names female, to Top dog name Tomato Films, because it top dog names of 2004 that Litton
By: | Sat, 22 Mar 08 17:28:21 +0000 | | | top dog name top dog name top dog names 2004 top dog names female top dog names top dog names 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog names top dog names 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog names female top dog names of 2004 top dog names top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog name top dog names of 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog names 2004 top dog names of 2004 top dog name top dog names top dog names top dog names top dog names female top dog names of 2004 top dog names of 2004
